Tron and Tether replaced T3 with Chainalysis a few weeks after the version closed down
TRON, Tether, and Chainalysis have formed a joint task force to identify and prevent illegal USDT activities on the TRON network. This agreement comes after the collapse of the T3 Financial Crimes Unit.
11/14/20264 min read
What is T3 and what has it achieved ?
T3 combined TRON, Tether, and TRM Labs in 2024 to track and freeze USDT involved in criminal activity on TRON, and they reported freezing hundreds of millions of USDT. This model is truly novel in one respect: it combines the chain operator, the token issuer, and an analytics firm into a single operating unit, a combination no public blockchain has ever done before.
The capabilities it demonstrates are also unsettling. Tether can unilaterally freeze any USDT balance at any address, and T3 has turned that power into large-scale operation with a process behind it. Regardless of what one thinks of the outcome, the existence of that switch is the most important fact about the largest stablecoin, and an official freeze program makes it a regular occurrence rather than an exception.
The collapse of T3 a few weeks ago has yet to be publicly explained in detail, which is why this new announcement deserves closer scrutiny. A partnership breaking down and then re-establishing with a replacement supplier can often be due to trade disputes or structural issues, neither of which have been described.
Why TRON ?
The reason lies in its concentration. TRON holds a massive portion of the circulating USDT and is the primary channel for stablecoin payments in regions where USDT is used as an alternative to the dollar. This also makes it a key channel for evading sanctions, obtaining proceeds from scams, and serving as a payment layer for fraudulent schemes in Southeast Asia, which U.S. Department of Justice task forces are cracking down on and which account for a large portion of the cryptocurrency losses suffered by individual victims.
Therefore, the task force is addressing a truly damaging problem. It's also addressing a real commercial risk, because the entire core value of TRON is high-volume payments at low cost, and a chain publicly described as the preferred transaction channel of phishing networks would be a business problem regardless of its technical advantages. The same dynamic explains Justin Sun's post-quantum statements: a payment channel must look secure.
Tether's motivations are even clearer. The company has refused MiCA licenses in Europe, faced a Senate report alleging USDT serves as a financial lifeline for Iran, and operates in the US market, where the OCC's GENIUS Act regulations took effect on January 18 and where the registration window hasn't opened yet. A clear, publicly disclosed anti-crime partnership is precisely what an issuer in that position needs to demonstrate.
Reasons for objection regarding the structure
The freezing is a coercive action by the issuer, not by the court. Tether makes decisions based on information from analytics providers and requests from law enforcement, and the address holder has no process. In most cases, the target is clearly the criminal, and no one objects. The objection lies in the architecture, which empowers a private company to seize assets without the right of appeal, without any published standards of evidence, and without court review.
That's the trade-off the market has made in choosing a centrally issued stablecoin as the primary payment asset, and that's why stolen funds are constantly being transferred from stablecoins to ETH within hours. The Crédit Mutuel Arkéa heist converted approximately $63 million worth of stablecoins into ETH in four hours precisely for this reason, and the money launderers on Binance are clearly constrained by a similar capability, which is why they transferred $430,000 at a time through self-created memecoins last week.
Read together, those two facts describe how the system works as intended and also explain why sophisticated operators aren't the ones who get caught. The power to freeze data is most effective against those who are slow and unprepared.
Assessment and Conclusion
Three things. A published explanation of why T3 ended, because a partnership that failed once without a clear reason is obviously no more sustainable than the latter. A reported freeze number accompanied by an appeal or error rate, because every enforcement system freezes some incorrect addresses and no program ever disclosed how frequently this happened. And a scope statement describing what triggered the freeze, so the standard isn't just something the three parties privately agreed upon. Until then, this announcement is merely a reaffirmation of capability, not news. This power existed before T3, exists after T3, and will exist after this.
Disclaimer: The content in this article is for informational, research, data analysis, and reference purposes only regarding the cryptocurrency market. All opinions, assessments, forecasts, or opinions reflect the author's perspective at the time of publication and do not constitute investment advice, solicitations for buying or selling, trading recommendations, advertising, marketing, or promotion of any financial products, services, or cryptocurrencies. Mentions of projects, tokens, protocols, exchanges, wallets, or cryptocurrency service providers (CASPs) are for research, analysis, or informational purposes only and should not be construed as endorsements, recommendations, or guarantees in any way. HCCVenture does not broker, advertise, market, promote, or connect users in Vietnam with any cryptocurrency services from CASPs. HCCVenture does not accept asset custody, investment mandates, manage assets, or execute transactions on behalf of clients. All investment decisions are made entirely through the reader's own research (DYOR), evaluation, and responsibility; HCCVenture is not liable for any losses or damages arising from the use of or reliance on the information presented in this article.
Compiled and analyzed by HCCVenture
Join our information channels: https://link3.to/holdcoincventure
Explore HCCVenture group
HCCVENTURE QUANT JSCO
© 2026 HCCVENTURE. ALL COPYRIGHTS RESERVED.
Connect with us
Popular content
Contact to us
Address: 8th Floor, Bach Dang Complex Building, 50 Bach Dang Street, Hai Chau Ward, Da Nang City, Vietnam.
Phone: 1900 1509
Gmail : sp_contact@hccventure.com
Disclaimer: The information on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice. We are not responsible for any risks or losses arising from investment decisions based on the content here.
TERMS AND CONDITIONS • CUSTOMER PROTECTION POLICY
ANALYTICAL AND NEWS CONTENT IS COMPILED AND PROVIDED BY EXPERTS IN THE FIELD OF DIGITAL FINANCE AND BLOCKCHAIN BELONGING TO HCCVENTURE ORGANIZATION, INCLUDING OWNERSHIP OF THE CONTENT.
RESPONSIBLE FOR MANAGING ALL CONTENT AND ANALYSIS: HCCVENTURE FOUNDER - TRUONG MINH HUY
Read warnings about scams and phishing emails — REPORT A PROBLEM WITH OUR SITE.
