The U.S. Department of Justice wins the right to seize $1.2 billion from the Binance theft.
The Department of Justice has received court approval to seize or freeze more than $1.2 billion stolen in the October 29 Binance hack, part of the more than $2.7 billion already frozen.
11/14/20264 min read
The meaning of the terms "Freeze," "Restriction," and "Confiscation"
The three numbers being mentioned are not the same, and the difference determines what the victim actually receives.
"Freezing," with over $2.7 billion, means the assets are currently immobile. The majority of this consists of stablecoin balances locked by issuers at the request of law enforcement and exchanges, plus funds frozen on platforms where the attackers attempted to convert them. The freeze is reversible and depends on continued cooperation from the cooperating parties.
"Restricted" or "permitted for seizure," for over $1.2 billion, means the court has found sufficient grounds to temporarily hold the assets pending seizure. This is a legally effective step and not yet a final decision on ownership.
"Confiscation," which never happened in any of these cases, is the stage where ownership is transferred to the government, after which a reimbursement or recovery process can return value to the victim. That process often takes years, and the gap between headlines about confiscation and the victim receiving their money back is where most public understanding of these cases is interrupted.
In summary, approximately one-fifth of the stolen funds are currently under court control, and none have been returned.
Why is this recovery amount unusually large?
North Korea's past operations have typically converted a large proportion of stolen funds, which is why this attribution carries so much weight. Recovering $2.7 billion within two weeks is a departure from that pattern, and this is explained more by scale than by superior forensic investigation capabilities.
Six billion dollars cannot be laundered through channels handling one hundred million dollars. The capacity for mixing money is finite, OTC conversion networks have limitations, and stablecoin issuers can freeze funds faster than the speed of the operator's movement. Evidence of that limitation was clearly demonstrated last week, when Elliptic discovered money launderers had created six memecoins to push approximately $430,000 each through liquidity pools. An operation operating in multiples of four hundred thousand dollars on a six billion dollar balance is one where the exits are blocked.
Investigators are still tracing assets that have been moved through intermediaries and exchanges, so the number of frozen assets could increase. It could also plateau, as the remaining funds are those that have already been paid.
The FaceStealer attack attracted the most attention.
This campaign operates by using stolen accounts to invite victims to video calls, then playing fake audio or video recordings (deepfakes) of people the victim knows, feigning technical problems, and tricking the victim into installing malware. In some cases, account hijacking occurs months or even a year after the initial intrusion. The FBI has seized over 900 webcam videos of victims and has issued instructions to those affected. The stolen contact lists are then used to reach other targets, including open-source software developers.
Two things in that description are worth noting. First, this attack defied common sense advice. Cryptocurrency users are advised to verify requests through a trusted channel with someone they know, and a video call with a familiar face is the practical way to implement that advice. A convincing deepfake video of an acquaintance bypassed the verification step that most people would consider sufficient.
Secondly, there's the matter of patience. Breaking into a computer and waiting a year before using that access means the victim no longer connects the final event to the original incident. It also means the 900 videos seized represent reconnaissance material collected over a long period, which is how the perpetrator builds the familiarity that deepfake videos rely on.
Targeting open-source developers directly links this to supply chain attacks in recent weeks, including the bee-js and Swarm Desktop breaches, where attackers gained access to maintainer accounts and the source of that access was never explained.
Assessment and Conclusion
Scott Proctor's view that North Korea funds its regime and weapons program through cryptocurrency theft is the prevailing policy context, and it has been accurate for years. What has changed is the defensive picture. A $6 billion theft resulted in $2.7 billion being frozen for two weeks, demonstrating that the industry's current ability to freeze and trace funds can scale faster than the ability to launder money at the highest levels.
That's a real breakthrough, and it doesn't benefit individuals. The FaceStealer method works against humans, and there are no post-steal freeze measures that can prevent the next engineer from joining the video call with a face they recognize. The vulnerable layer remains the human layer.
Disclaimer: The content in this article is for informational, research, data analysis, and reference purposes only regarding the cryptocurrency market. All opinions, assessments, forecasts, or opinions reflect the author's perspective at the time of publication and do not constitute investment advice, solicitations for buying or selling, trading recommendations, advertising, marketing, or promotion of any financial products, services, or cryptocurrencies. Mentions of projects, tokens, protocols, exchanges, wallets, or cryptocurrency service providers (CASPs) are for research, analysis, or informational purposes only and should not be construed as endorsements, recommendations, or guarantees in any way. HCCVenture does not broker, advertise, market, promote, or connect users in Vietnam with any cryptocurrency services from CASPs. HCCVenture does not accept asset custody, investment mandates, manage assets, or execute transactions on behalf of clients. All investment decisions are made entirely through the reader's own research (DYOR), evaluation, and responsibility; HCCVenture is not liable for any losses or damages arising from the use of or reliance on the information presented in this article.
Compiled and analyzed by HCCVenture
Join our information channels: https://link3.to/holdcoincventure
Explore HCCVenture group
HCCVENTURE QUANT JSCO
© 2026 HCCVENTURE. ALL COPYRIGHTS RESERVED.
Connect with us
Popular content
Contact to us
Address: 8th Floor, Bach Dang Complex Building, 50 Bach Dang Street, Hai Chau Ward, Da Nang City, Vietnam.
Phone: 1900 1509
Gmail : sp_contact@hccventure.com
Disclaimer: The information on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice. We are not responsible for any risks or losses arising from investment decisions based on the content here.
TERMS AND CONDITIONS • CUSTOMER PROTECTION POLICY
ANALYTICAL AND NEWS CONTENT IS COMPILED AND PROVIDED BY EXPERTS IN THE FIELD OF DIGITAL FINANCE AND BLOCKCHAIN BELONGING TO HCCVENTURE ORGANIZATION, INCLUDING OWNERSHIP OF THE CONTENT.
RESPONSIBLE FOR MANAGING ALL CONTENT AND ANALYSIS: HCCVENTURE FOUNDER - TRUONG MINH HUY
Read warnings about scams and phishing emails — REPORT A PROBLEM WITH OUR SITE.
