DBS and Citi finalize Singapore dollar to New York dollar conversion transaction
DBS and Citi's New York office have completed a cross-border payment transaction in US dollars, using encrypted deposits on Swift's Digital Ledger.
9/8/20264 min read
Why is the difference from Stablecoins important?
The payment method used is a tokenized bank deposit, not a stablecoin, and the difference lies in structure rather than semantics. A tokenized deposit is a digital claim on a physical bank deposit recorded on a distributed ledger. This deposit remains on the issuing bank's balance sheet as a liability and is subject to standard deposit, customer identity verification (KYC), and capital regulations that govern commercial banks' money. Nothing leaves the realm of regulated banking.
Conversely, stablecoins are anonymous instruments issued by a non-bank institution based on reserves held separately from the banking system, with holders having claims against the issuer rather than a bank deposit relationship. That difference dictates regulatory handling, capital requirements, insurance status, and counterparty risk profile.
The commercial implication is that tokenized deposits allow banks to provide the continuous payment capability that stablecoins have pioneered without requiring corporate treasurers to move funds outside of their existing banking relationships, credits, and regulatory safeguards. For a treasurer at a multinational corporation, holding a stablecoin balance and holding a tokenized deposit balance are two entirely different positions in terms of risk, accounting, and regulation, even if both are settled within minutes on the weekend.
Coordination, not payment.
Swift's ledger is an access-based orchestration layer built on Hyperledger Besu, the same EVM-compatible enterprise blockchain that BlackRock's ICS tokenized equities in Europe and DTCC's tokenized securities transactions in July also used. The ledger records and matches payment obligations between participating entities while final settlement continues to be executed through existing systems, with banks retaining control of assets throughout the process.
That architectural choice is why this initiative can progress so quickly. Swift isn't trying to replace the payment infrastructure that transfers value between banks, which would require regulatory approval across every jurisdiction and rebuilding decades of institutional infrastructure. It's replacing the orchestration layer that determines what should be paid and when, which is where the friction caused by weekends and time zones really stems.
When a cashier in Singapore sends a dollar payment on Friday afternoon, the delay is not due to a physical impossibility of transferring the value. It is because correspondent banks and clearing systems operate during business hours in specific jurisdictions, each system processing orders sequentially before the payment is completed. This ledger allows two participating banks to record and match obligations directly on a shared record without waiting for their respective transaction chains, and payment is executed through conventional channels once the data is available.
The position of DBS and Citi in the broader context of encrypted deposits
Both banks have appeared simultaneously in numerous encrypted deposit initiatives, notably demonstrating that neither bank views Swift's ledger as a proprietary commitment.
DBS is the only Asia-based bank among the 12 institutions in Swift's core design team, which shapes the ledger architecture. The bank launched DBS Token Services in 2024, a suite of blockchain-based banking services including DBS Treasury Tokens to manage its licensed on-chain liquidity. In November 2025, the bank reached a framework agreement with JPMorgan's Kinexys unit, enabling transfers between their respective deposit token ecosystems, establishing interoperability between the two cryptocurrency platforms operated by the bank.
Citi joined the Swift pilot program in July 2026 and operates Citi Token Services on a private chain alongside its 24/7 USD Clearing solution, which welcomed Siam Commercial Bank as its first external bank in July. Citi is a separate part of a consortium of major US banks developing a tokenized deposit network through The Clearing House, aiming for a launch in the first half of 2027, as commented by The Clearing House CEO David Watson, as reported by the Wall Street Journal in June. Citi also announced the Custody+ platform on August 18th with plans to offer native Bitcoin custody services before the end of the year.
This overlap means the encrypted deposit landscape is currently characterized by the construction of parallel infrastructure rather than convergence to a single standard, with the same organization participating in the Swift ledger, The Clearing House network, and bilateral agreements between banks simultaneously. Which system will become the dominant one, or whether interoperability agreements will allow them to coexist, remains unresolved.
Assessment and Conclusion
The fact that DBS and Citi described this transaction as proof that continuous cross-border payments have become a reality is a direct response to the argument about stablecoin adoption, which has garnered significant interest from institutions up to 2026.
Stablecoin transaction volume reached a record $1.79 trillion in June 2026, and the argument that stablecoins offer capabilities unmatched by banks has fueled interest from Visa, Mastercard, Stripe, and payment networks building stablecoin infrastructure. The specific capability at the heart of that argument is continuous availability: a USDC transfer transaction is completed on a Saturday because the blockchain network doesn't adhere to bank business hours.
The response from the crypto deposit side is that banks can provide similar continued availability while keeping funds within a regulated deposit framework, which addresses counterparty risk, regulatory processing, and integration issues that deter corporate treasurers from holding large stablecoin balances. Whether that response is commercially viable depends on the speed of implementation compared to stablecoin adoption, and whether crypto deposit networks achieve a network effect that makes them usable across the entire range of counterparties a multinational corporation trades with, rather than just among specific banks that have built compatible infrastructure.
Disclaimer: The content in this article is for informational, research, data analysis, and reference purposes only regarding the cryptocurrency market. All opinions, assessments, forecasts, or opinions reflect the author's perspective at the time of publication and do not constitute investment advice, solicitations for buying or selling, trading recommendations, advertising, marketing, or promotion of any financial products, services, or cryptocurrencies. Mentions of projects, tokens, protocols, exchanges, wallets, or cryptocurrency service providers (CASPs) are for research, analysis, or informational purposes only and should not be construed as endorsements, recommendations, or guarantees in any way. HCCVenture does not broker, advertise, market, promote, or connect users in Vietnam with any cryptocurrency services from CASPs. HCCVenture does not accept asset custody, investment mandates, manage assets, or execute transactions on behalf of clients. All investment decisions are made entirely through the reader's own research (DYOR), evaluation, and responsibility; HCCVenture is not liable for any losses or damages arising from the use of or reliance on the information presented in this article.
Compiled and analyzed by HCCVenture
Join our information channels: https://link3.to/holdcoincventure
Explore HCCVenture group
HCCVENTURE QUANT JSCO
© 2026 HCCVENTURE. ALL COPYRIGHTS RESERVED.
Connect with us
Popular content
Contact to us
Address: 8th Floor, Bach Dang Complex Building, 50 Bach Dang Street, Hai Chau Ward, Da Nang City, Vietnam.
Phone: 1900 1509
Gmail : sp_contact@hccventure.com
Disclaimer: The information on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice. We are not responsible for any risks or losses arising from investment decisions based on the content here.
TERMS AND CONDITIONS • CUSTOMER PROTECTION POLICY
ANALYTICAL AND NEWS CONTENT IS COMPILED AND PROVIDED BY EXPERTS IN THE FIELD OF DIGITAL FINANCE AND BLOCKCHAIN BELONGING TO HCCVENTURE ORGANIZATION, INCLUDING OWNERSHIP OF THE CONTENT.
RESPONSIBLE FOR MANAGING ALL CONTENT AND ANALYSIS: HCCVENTURE FOUNDER - TRUONG MINH HUY
Read warnings about scams and phishing emails — REPORT A PROBLEM WITH OUR SITE.
